Why is exclusion worse than cultural appropriation? I'm excluded from the traditions of the first nations people where I live because I'm not first nations, is that a bad thing?
Most sports are not as recent as break and do not have the same cultural significance. Break was developed by an oppressed people who have historically had their artistic creations repackaged and sold without their involvement. I have no idea whether breaks inclusion in the games is cultural appropriation but I don't feel like you are giving the proper context to the conversation.
Cultural appropriation is not bullshit. Look at the history of black people in america. Their art forms were copied by white people, sanitized, then sold to the masses with zero credit or compensation given to them. I'm not saying that only black people should be able to perform or enjoy those art forms, but there is a significant difference between respectful imitation and theft. Art forms that were created in large part due to the oppression they were put through, were copied with zero respect or acknowledgement, then repackaged and sold to the very people oppressing them. If you can't see how that is a bad thing then idk what to say.
To be clear I'm not arguing break being included in the olympics is cultural appropriation, that's for the culture to decide not me.
Man fuck all the downvoters, this is a perfectly valid question. If they started a haka competition people wouldn't be so quick to dismiss this.
To answer you question, no idea, never thought of it. I'm pretty ignorant of break culture but I'd be interested to hear what those in the culture think of it's inclusion.
I have to cycle on the roads with cars every day. My favourite bar's patio is literally in the parking lane of a busy 4 lane thoroughfare. I will take cigarette smokers any day over the fumes and noise I have to deal with from cars.
We only deal with it because it's normalized and most people can't imagine a convenient alternative.
People associate scooters and mopeds with being on the road with cars. By calling it an ebike they are making it clear what use case they intend for the bike. Hence why the promo video shows it being used in bike lanes and a couple having fun near a waterfront, that's the type of stuff you do on a bike not a moped.
Depends on local laws I would assume. Where I live e-bikes are limited to 30km/h and must have pedals (although throttles are still allowed). Functionally yes you aren't pedaling but in terms of speed and weight it is closer to a bicycle than a motorcycle. If I ride an e-bike but only use the throttle does it cease to be an ebike?
Honestly as much as I hate dudes on fat bikes ripping past me in the bike lane I can't think of any good reasons not to encourage all forms of micromobility. The more people who use and rely on cycling infrastructure the better. If that means I have to share my bike lane with douchebags on fat bikes so be it.
Just to be clear, I have no issue with fat bikes themselves. But we all know the type of person I'm talking about.
Hockey players are another breed. Not agreeing with his decision but also not that surprised.
Also, "sets exactly a good precedent"? I don't see why this man should be expected to make personal/medical decisions based on "setting a good precedent".
It's honestly been depressing seeing how seemingly universal this reaction has been. I expected jokes and made some myself amongst friends. But I did not expect the entire community to unite behind a legitimate desire for violence.
What does justified even mean in this context though? Are you in favour of capital punishment? Of vigilante justice?
Trump is a horrible person who, if elected, will harm the lives of very many people. I simply do not believe assassinating him is a legitimate tactic. There are so many problems inherent with political violence that I don't even know where to start.
To me, advocating for political violence is a position detached from reality. Akin to wondering why the western world doesn't simply declare war on Russia over their invasion of Ukraine. It may seem/be the morally correct thing to do, but the consequences of doing it are far reaching and extremely complicated.
Honestly idk what I'm trying to say other than I don't think violence against Nazis is an effective strategy. I think it's reactionary and short sighted and will only make the problem worse.
Fuck genocide Joe. Dudes selfish as fuck and only backed out when he realized he was gonna lose.