Skip Navigation

User banner

LeninWeave [none/use name, any]

@ LeninWeave @hexbear.net

Posts
82
Comments
3668
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • You mean to interpret my point as "actually disabled people should be allowed to own slaves"? I agree that it's an absurd interpretation.

    However, in defense of dustcommie, dustcommie's comment does acknowledge that (with "which I don't think is your point").

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • Oh, OK. Thanks for explaining.

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • also the fact that the "disabled slaver" thing is a meme like I said before.

    Oh, I didn't realize this. Still, I don't see how bringing it up in this context (the tweet is definitely about the BAFTA awards, based on their timeline) can not be ableist, unless it was responding to some specific racist point someone else made and there's no indication of that that I can see.

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • Isn't moot the creator of 4chan, though? I'm just confused what he has to do with this tweet.

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • What does moot have to do with this?

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • Even if it is

    I don't see what else it could be. I had a quick look at their profile, they've been posting/RTing a lot about it.

    you are giving pretty uncharitable reading...

    Perhaps. I'm open to being wrong about this if there's something else they have said that gives this more context.

    Your post reads more like defending disabled people owning slaves than any abelism from RGB(which I don't think is your point).

    Yes, of course that's not my point. Nothing excuses owning another human being. I expanded on my interpretation here.

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • My interpretation is that it's a sarcastic attempt to liken the two following ideas.

    • A person with Tourette's isn't saying slurs because they're racist (which is correct).
    • A person can't be held accountable for owning slaves because they needed help due to a disability (this is absurd).

    The implication that those are at all similar seems very ableist to me. Of course, it's possible I've misinterpreted it, which is the problem with this kind of "hot take" Twitter bait method of communication.

    Also, does BRG use they/them? I wasn't aware. If so I should edit my other comment.

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • Oh god, of course this isn't his first post about this.

    I've been avoiding this discourse on Twitter because... well, the obvious reasons.

    1. Always pay your guys.
    2. This is probably true, but obviously also a counterintelligence operation to make the AFU and mercs distrust each other.
  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • Possibly true, but that doesn't make it any less ableist (not that you're saying it does). I anything, it makes it more ableist. If it's just bait then the goal is purely to offend disabled people.

  • Locked

    Oh no

    Jump
  • No, it's just ableism.

  • Also their idea of "rights" for a digital slave is "the slave work shouldn't be too boring".

  • "Because they're such a closed country!"

    "Which means you have no evidence to your point either?"

    "Well, missionaries... anyway!"

    YOU CAN GO THERE ON VACATION

    BUSINESSMEN GO THERE ALL THE TIME

    ENGLISH TEACHERS

  • lmao, thanks for explaining.

  • HAM SANDWICH RACE

  • "You see tankie, the real problem is hypothetical white genocide in a meme I misinterpreted."