Very depressing. We’re social animals, and being highly literate and informed while also socially apt, you really realize just how far apart you are from others, which is alienating, frustrating, and tiresome.

Regulate profit on housing, problem solved.

They got revokeable permission apparently.

Nice he’s great.

I agree with your second point. I think civilized literate people have to have the nuanced discussion, and I agree the rest is just a hatred playbook.

This is why when you get permission, where you must plan for a decade of work, and they are saying yes, you get them to say in perpetuity and non-revokeable.

That’s what taxes and public utilities are for. Convert them.

That’s the question I posed even though 8 people currently are illiterate and downvoted

Isn’t that the point though, that it affects the 99%?

If half are in each division, and if a few athletes out of 250,000 all perform in the top 1% or better because they switched to a protected division displacing 99%+ who don’t have arguable eligibility for that protected division…

I don’t know if that’s the statistic, but isn’t that the general concept? That it’s unfair to a huge number of other athletes that lose?

No regular user can configure anything. Most are barely literate and have the reading comprehension of a 6-8 year old.

Ai allows them to just say, turn down the brightness, turn down the volume, use this program to open this file from now on, which makes 10% configuration accessible to the 99% who otherwise would have 1% or less.

Needs very minor tweaks to look like him

I’m sure the actual paper defines this better, but without a definition of what puts something in this category, it’s not useful.

Even for bread, is it all bread? Is it added gluten? Is it a specific preservative? Is it only bread with bleached flour?

Even so, mass produced and packaged is not the actual contributor…

Same with prepared food… Costco makes prepared food that is equivalent to what you’d make at home. It’s that still bad? If not, what other prepared food is fine?

Surprise, it’s religious history.

This is the exact semantic they are talking about in the post. You just have different semantic parent objects. You want trans/cis with parent of woman, they used Transwoman/woman with parent as person. They are semantically equivalent.

You won’t like the answer. If you don’t want to be lumped in with other magical thinkers, then don’t be a magical thinker, else you’re in the same boat and should be evaluated the same. All flavors are the same and all are destructive, just with differing exact details. It is possible to be a scientific thinker and be evil, but this can be changed with evidence on the whole, but it is not possible to be a magical thinker and to not contribute to evil, and those aspects cannot be changed as they are core to a faulty methodology of thinking which is pervasive, insidious, and pseudo-randomly aligned with changing educational theory. If you think it’s possible to only align magical thinking with benevolent acts, you’re wrong.

No true Scotsman. All religion is evil by nature of faith over evidence and magical thinking.

This question should be illegal. Name changes should be simple and up to the individual when they have autonomy. Before then, you get whatever your parents want, because names are just made up nonsense anyway.

Yet here you are

I can see the value in practice makes perfect, but I still think everything will just be ignored, as they can continue to act via pure policy without obstruction.

Less than 5% of possible voters as a best case scenario in a peaceful protest… Will be entirely ignored.

Logistics is not an artificial creation however