Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
0
Comments
283
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Define better... Then better for who?

  • The silicone jackets that lock them inside your ear are far superior for them not falling out. Locking in the sound for quality is also much better with silicone plugs.

  • How did the other side get so many votes being extremely culturally abnormal? The claim makes no sense.

  • I don't think that's the logic. Gay people don't just go back to having babies because they had some rights removed.

    The policy is deeply rooted in the concept of in groups and out groups.

  • And they should be getting paid for that time no matter what. No tip needed unless they are putting on a special show or gave you suggestions you needed.

  • That's just naive in this context.

  • That is for you to decide

  • You should look inside yourself. At what level would your mind accept that you are at war? At what level would you accept that losses to your group are acceptable if lesser than your enemy? Keep in mind, if your answer is none, then the enemy wins via attrition.

  • I mean, who is it? Is it more my enemy or my friend?

  • Capable of what though? We have all the evidence we need that our parents and their parents are brain damaged. Maybe that kind of cognitive capability is bad and there's a goldilocks zone to go back to.

  • Was likely 2 hours a day actual attended care, 1000 a day, 90k for 3 months, plus rent, food, materials, another 500 a day. That's $135-155k even with conservative care in nicu. In a real nicu that would be 10x

  • Whether we like it or not, it's not trespass and it wasn't to spy on or eavesdrop. In fact the hidden camera in his house actually qualifies more, but likely wouldn't qualify for gratification.

  • Please provide a definition so we can frame your argument.

  • You think they're giving out low rate 30-50 year rolling personal loans in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars range? This I find hard to believe. The premise makes sense, but I don't think these loans usually exist.

  • No they don't. You cannot buy yourself what they have with charity money. That's just the influence part.

  • None of that explains anything for wealth levels we're talking about. Negative gearing implies a loss elsewhere, trusts max out at the same rate as all other inheritance they just avoid probate, retirement maxes out way earlier than what they have.

  • This is going to be a shocker, but the world has always been like this. This one is just in the news right now a lot. Imagine all the things you never heard about, it's a million times more.

  • They get indoctrinated with all kinds of other bullshit. They can take some truth home.

  • It's like tipping... It happens because we let it. It's so incredibly common that literally poor teachers are paying for basic supplies the school doesn't when they should look those kids in the eyes and tell them they are sorry and that their society and school have failed them and to go home and tell their parents to vote differently.