I would imagine NATO would exclude the USA and remain as it is. IIRC, Trump spoke of leaving NATO in the past as well, so he'd be happy to sell it as his own.
I assume such efforts have not been made yet because the USA remains an important member on paper, because of its military, as long as it has not taken that action yet, and because politicians hope that Trump's term will end with a shift back to cooperative politics.
Vor allem geht vieles oder alles an der Merz'schen Bubble vorbei. Auch wenn sich jene mit Expertise äußern.
Wo soll man sich als Unternehmen äußern? Wo würde die Presse das aufgreifen und wo würden wir das (sonst) irgendwie mitbekommen?
Merz labert scheisse. Presse druckt es ab. Hinterfragt und mit Kontext bzw anderen Meinungen gespickt wird es in der Nachrichtenpresse eher selten / bei nur wenigen Nachrichtenmedien.
The Anime Grave of the Fireflies (AniDB) is a heart-wrenching telling of the impact and consequences of war.
Come and See (TMDB), a 1985 soviet anti-war film. I haven't watched it yet, but I've seen it mentioned multiple times as significant or exceptional, heart-wrenching. (Looks like other comments mention it as well, as expected. :P)
I'm a bit disappointed I can't recall much else right now, and of different kinds than just the misery of war. Two other anime pop into my head, but the aspects asked for aren't a major part of them.
There's been speculation and analysis of their letter of whether it was translated from Russian. Some specific words and formulations may imply such.
The closeness and trail of Russia to AfD to numerous (parliament?) requests about energy infrastructure can also be seen as a strong indicator of association.
Add to that Russian scouting via drones.
Ultimately, I find it far less likely for a left extremist group to be active right now. We haven't seen leftist terrorism for a long time. At the same time, Russia has been very active in such areas and also false-flag operations etc.
Sales and marketing is often mostly bullshitting anyway. It also has a lot less risk and constraint associated to generated text having issues. Not surprised they were more on board. The tool is more fitting for those use cases anyway.
The IFV is protected against 30 mm projectiles in the frontal projection and 14.5 mm rounds from the sides. The vehicle’s floor provides protection against an explosion equivalent to 10 kg of TNT.
I feel like specs nowadays, and specifically when related to Ukraine, should include meaningful drone/explosives resilience. But I guess they don't say anything about anti-tank projectiles either.
Dass Regulierung etwas ändern würde, kann man in jedem Fall mittelfristig nicht mit rechnen.
Dies ist auch eine Chance, ein größerflächiges Verlassen zu organisieren und die vielen Probleme der Plattform klar und öffentlichkeitswirksam anzusprechen, was sicherlich nochmal einen guten Effekt auf andere hätte.
Schade, dass da immer noch nichts passiert. Die diversen Probleme der Plattform sind bekannt, und wenn man aktuell in die USA schaut und auf die Nähe und Machtposition von Xitter, dann wird es höchste Zeit aktiv zu werden.
Und dann ein schöner FAQ Eintrag "warum sind wir nicht auf X".
und warum man das Indiskutable diskutiere, sagte die Pressestelle nicht.
Super, dass diese Irrsinnigkeit erkannt und im Artikel benannt wurde.
Mit 'indiskutabel' war sicherlich das Verhalten der Plattform als inakzeptabel gemeint. Im Zusammenhang der Frage und Antwort macht es aber keinen Sinn.
I would imagine NATO would exclude the USA and remain as it is. IIRC, Trump spoke of leaving NATO in the past as well, so he'd be happy to sell it as his own.
I assume such efforts have not been made yet because the USA remains an important member on paper, because of its military, as long as it has not taken that action yet, and because politicians hope that Trump's term will end with a shift back to cooperative politics.