Fun fact: "Krebs" is German for "crab".
- 帖子
- 49
- 评论
- 3071
- 加入于
- 5 yr. ago
- 帖子
- 49
- 评论
- 3071
- 加入于
- 5 yr. ago
It's a logo commonly used for political movements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_fist
It certainly isn't just nouns, you do have classics like "zusammensetzen" (put together) and "verschlimmbessern" (to make something worse, despite attempting to improve it).
But yeah, I'm having a hard time coming up with a particularly long composite verb that still makes sense.Usually, it's one word + a normal verb to kind of change the meaning of the verb, like "tanzen" means "to dance", and "seiltanzen" means "to walk on a tightrope" (literally: "to rope-dance").
And while you could theoretically extend it, e.g. as "hochseiltanzen" ("Hochseil" is a tightrope that's high above the ground; literally "high-rope"), we just say "auf dem Hochseil tanzen" instead ("to dance on the high-rope").Or I guess, you'd specify that it's a Hochseil once and then say "seiltanzen" in the following sentences.
Last week at work, we had the lights on in the morning and as we went for lunch, I flipped the switch to turn them off. In that moment, you hear a loud bang and the lights won't turn back on anymore.
The next day, a technician comes in to look at it. He puts the fuse back in and all the lights work again. He decides to check all the capacitors on the lamps in case one of them blew out and finds nothing.
In the week before that, one of the fluorescent tubes got swapped, so that's our only clue why something like this might happen. Kind of wild that it can just go bang with nothing to show for it, except the blown-out fuse.
I happen to be a software developer, so I hope you're in for an info dump:
Webpages are generally designed as documents. You type a URL into your browser, it downloads a webpage document and displays it. This simple concept also allows for hyperlinks and browsing history, which just put another URL into your browser, so that it downloads and displays a different document.
But it does not work for everything. For example, this meme was brought to you by the web version of Microsoft Teams™, where if you were to switch between pages by downloading entirely separate documents, then you'd get kicked out of calls every time you do so.
This is why the entirety of MS Teams is using a singular document. It's a so-called Single-Page Application, SPA (insert scary music here).When you click on a navigation element, it doesn't put a new URL into your browser for it to download. Instead, some JavaScript monstrosity starts churning, downloads whatever information it needs and then modifies the displayed document, so that it looks as if you had navigated away.
To make it extra confusing, it also does typically change the displayed URL, it just doesn't instruct the browser to download+display the respective document. It does this, because it tries to emulate a normal, document-based webpage, with browser history and where you can link to subpages.
Well, and this is then why opening in a new tab is often broken. Because there is no link there. It has to emulate the behaviour of a link via JavaScript just as well. If the developers do a bad job at that and never try out shortcuts like middle-click or Ctrl+click, then they may never get implemented.
Having said all that, there's also a chance that the devs decided to intentionally hinder opening in a new tab.Because MS Teams and other SPAs are JavaScript monstrosities, downloading+displaying the document anew like when opening in a new tab takes an obscene amount of time.And having two tabs of it open means that you get two notification sounds for each notification, and users might accidentally join multiple calls.
But yeah, that I can't have a call in fullscreen on one monitor and respond to chat messages on another monitor, without jumping through hoops like in the post, that's just bad either way.
Well, in this case I'm merely talking about the webpage not giving access to the right-click menu, as well as to shortcuts like middle-mouse-click and Ctrl+click, which would normally allow you to open parts of it in a new tab.
If a webpage were to actually check for cookies, to try to detect whether you've got two tabs of it open, then yeah, Container Tabs would be a solution for that, since it isolates the cookies.
Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar, nur nicht in der CDU. Da bürdet man es einer Frau auf, öffentlich zu verkünden, dass ihre Partei nicht die Intention hatte, sie gleichwertig zu behandeln.
Ja, der Humor von extra3 setzt irgendwo schon einen Gefallen am Fiktionalen voraus.Gibt ja auch immer den Maxi Schafroth, der mehrere Minuten lang irgendwelche Politiker nachstellt, aber dabei frei erfundenen Quatsch erzählt. Soweit ich weiß, lieben manche Leute die Beiträge, während mir so gar nicht klar wird, warum das gesamte Konzept überhaupt lustig sein soll...
Also was ich von einem Arbeitskollegen so mitbekomme, ist das eigentlich schon ziemlich normal. In den kälteren Monaten häuft sich das natürlich nochmal, aber ich meine er hat auch wirklich mal gesagt, dass eigentlich immer mindestens eine Seuche im Umlauf ist.
Könnte mir vorstellen, dass das auch als Touristenattraktion zieht...
It has been a thing for longer that extensions are not allowed to make connections to the internet, unless it's actually required for the functionality they advertise. And I believe, they have some rudimentary code scans in place to check for that. Besides that, there's also their Recommended Extensions program, where they do thorough code reviews for a subset of available extensions.
They have the Recommended Extensions program, where they do that for a subset of the available extensions.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/recommended-extensions-program
Yeah, HeliBoard or FlorisBoard would've been my recommendation. They're very similar, though (and presumably share most code between themselves).
Multiple people have said that, yeah. But they also said that he did not particularly distance himself from the project, which is definitely something I would do, if I found out about this kind of backing.
Believe what you want, but Drew DeVault has more of a reputation than FUTO.
From a communication viewpoint, that is fair, but to my knowledge (from being a professional software developer), effectively any license that is not 'open-source' or 'free' is by definition proprietary.
Because those two terms describe licensing standards (the only established ones that I know of). Whereas I believe, "proprietary license" uses this meaning of proprietary:
Nonstandard and controlled by one particular organization.
So, they wrote that license themselves is the point. What it says in there is secondary in meaning.
This is so highly relevant because in legal disputes, there is certain license compatibilities which are known to be possible.You can take a library licensed under the MIT license and use it in a project that uses the Apache-2.0 license and you're perfectly fine. This is the foundation of why the open-source ecosystem exists at all.
But you cannot take the source code from FUTO and use it in a differently licensed project, because no legal precedents exist to support this. (I believe, the FUTO license also actively prohibits this in some way, but that's beside the point.)This has massive implications. Like, yeah, you can look at the code, but it is useless. If FUTO closes shop or enshittifies, you cannot fork their projects.And because you cannot legally re-use their source code in other projects, likely no one looks at it in depth either.
Today, one of our managers at work told us that the communication department now recommends against using generative AI for creating social media posts. Their reasoning is that people recognize the tone of AI and then just skip reading your post.
Whatever the explanation is, this presumably means they have actual data that generated posts just don't do as well. And that it's worth it to spend the time writing a post by hand rather than flood your channels with tons of posts no one wants to read.
Here they started doing such phishing tests a while ago and our IT department had significantly worse stats than other departments, in terms of how often we would click on the link in the phishing mail.
And yeah, the conclusion was that we were just being asshats that decided to poke around in the obvious phishing mails for the fun of it. Rather than getting extra security training, management told us to just stop dicking around, so that our stats look better.
Ja, ich hoffe, dass es diesmal anders läuft, weil im Moment ja wirkliche politische Schwierigkeiten mit den USA bestehen. Es könnte jederzeit passieren, dass der Trumpete doch nochmal einfällt, dass sie gerne mehr Zölle hätte, oder eben anderweitige politische Forderungen stellt, bei denen wir nicht nein sagen können, weil wir so abhängig von US-Unternehmen sind.
Also im Moment ist in Schleswig-Holstein sogar eine schwarz-grüne Regierung unterwegs. An der grünen Regierungsbeteiligung erkennt man vielleicht schon, dass es nicht der Rechtsaußen-Flügel der CDU ist, aber eben trotzdem noch eine konservative Partei. Da würde ich nicht erwarten, dass die sowas in Angriff nehmen oder zumindest mittragen, wenn sie nicht akut Konsequenzen sehen würden.
Yeah, people would understand it, but would look at you funny.Partially, because they're just not used to it. "Hochseil" and "seiltanzen" are composite words, but are also just used commonly, so they have made it into the dictionary as separate entries. Meanwhile, "hochseiltanzen" is merely a neologism at this point.But it does also just sound like you're really shoehorning in that you're specifically walking on a high wire. Like you're just bragging about it.
What's also kind of funny, is that we have nominalization in German as well, so where a verb (or other word) is used as a noun, and using "das Hochseiltanzen" as a noun does not sound out of place to me. In fact, when I throw "hochseiltanzen" into a search engine, I get four results, all of which use it as a noun and like it's a completely normal word that does not need explaining.