Coal mining enthusiast
I don't quite get what caused your radicalization - was it the media corporations that own the vast majority of the journals/newspapers (like Murdoch press or Gannett that you have mentioned)? Is it being worked like a mule for 8 hours? Is it both?
Nevertheless, it was a nice read, and I fully agree with your remark at the end that you can't really change this kind of system from within, as the power is concentrated with people who benefit from it being worse and worse for everyone except the few.
Much like yourself, I was raised under the impression that we live in a marketplace of ideas, that there is no objective truth and the greatest ideas will naturally come to the top and be adopted, it's why things are the way they are now. I was drinking it in, I had hope that various institutions had our best interests in mind and whoever opposed them was just some misunderstanding conspiracy nut. But, as I got older I grew more disillusioned with this notion, seeing and experiencing inequalities built into the system, how it's not good ideas that dictate how we live but capital/money and how this kind of system is constantly reinforcing itself through media/who money goes to/who gets to be elected and so on.
That being said, is there a way out of this I wonder? What we need is nothing short of a leftist revolution, but the left is and has been in perpetual defeat since 1991, and the center and far-right cannot be relied upon as they dance to the whims of our feudal overlords. And even if there is some light at the tunnel, it might just turn out to be another incoming train.
Please put a censor on the handholding, it's too lewd
Waking up at the same time every day, no matter if it's a weekend or a weekday and no matter if you stayed up too late and won't be getting full 8 hours of sleep.
As obvious as this might sound, this has really helped me to regulate my sleep schedule, something I've really been struggling with for pretty much my entire life.
Adopting leftist music by perverting its meaning is pretty much the M.O. of far-right anthems/songs, no matter what the song was about originally. See: Tomorrow Belongs to Me, Fortunate son (to a milder extent), Born in the U.S.A as some of more well-known English examples.
I wonder if this was an attempt at doing precisely that, or was it just some publicity stunt for the movement.
It's kinda difficult to find cracked Linux-native games, though one site that I do know which has a section for it is Torrminator. Don't really want to get in trouble with the mods so can't post the link, but if you do end up finding the site, then I hope it has whatever games you're looking for.
I'm not from US, but rather Eastern Europe, though I do admit that the most news I see is from US due to them being the majority on most popular internet sites.
That being said, I'm not talking just about the US but rather western world as a whole, particularly US, Western Europe and my home country, Lithuania. Unless I slept through some event where oppressive systems there got dismantled this century, what I wrote should, at least from my perspective, still apply to those regions and not just the US.
Don't get me wrong, I fully agree with you and the post. It's what SHOULD be happening - after all, the rich and powerful are not going to let power be voted away from them, which means some kind of direct action is needed.
My issue, however, is that there's just no such action happening in reality and there really hasn't been for decades - there are protests, there are some attempts, but they're nowhere close to being successful enough to make an impact. Hell, the right seems to be doing a better job on that regard for some reason, with events like January 6th being something that the left should have been doing.
With all this in mind, that kind of rhetoric starts sounding more like empty slogans or even LARPing in a way.
To be fair, there hasn't really been a dismantling of oppressive social systems in a long while (major ones anyway), so that's not really that great of a strategy to rely on
Ironically enough, even the "think for themselves, it's all nuanced" option often gets picked up from subscribing to someone else's views, mostly because staying in the middle and considering all options sounds like the 'smart thing to do' even if there's some deliberate ignorance of the facts to retain this position (like with the current Israel Palestine war).
It's a very similar thing to those kids in school who'd hear the quote "I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing", then go around and immediately start telling everyone how they know nothing to try and appear very deep and smart.
Besides, there's way less original thought in the world than you think - in order to actually properly research a subject and MAYBE come to a nuanced, informed, open-minded view, you'd have to do a ton of research, know all the history and little quirks, things that most people don't have time or education to do especially for multiple important events going on at the same time.
Anyway sorry, I write too much
Don't fall into doomerism - news companies are companies, and negativity gets people on their platforms for much longer than positivity, it's easy to get addicted to it. Set time limits or limit the amount of news you consume per day/per week.
Recognize that caring about something requires mental energy - if you had 1 friend who asks you to care about their hobby or learn a bit more, then you might agree, but if you have 20 friends with different hobbies asking the same thing, then there's no way you can care about all of them. Similar thing applies to the news, recognize that you can't care about everything and try learning how to stay informed without giving up lots of mental energy stressing about things you can't really influence.
It's admirable wanting to keep up with the news, but it also can be a bit of a trap and does require a degree of skill to not fall into what you describe in your post.
A few weeks ago there was this article posted here about why some game companies are trying so hard to kill their old video games and give 0 shits about preservation (as in delisting them from stores, not selling them anymore, etc.).
One of the answers given by the publishers in the article basically boils down to "old, preserved games would compete with the newer ones and eat into their sales", which does say quite a lot - they don't care about losing sales of older video games, all that matters is the sales of the newer ones, preservation be damned.
Someone poor gets murdered: You're lucky if they're gonna bother checking a couple of cameras and do some interviews
Someone rich gets murdered: Begin nationwide search for the culprit, look through every single camera in the city to see their tracks, plaster their face all over the media and offer $50,000 of tax payer money to anyone who might have any information
Yeah, fair point
I had the impression this was a privilege exclusive to the conservatives
Maybe it's because the guy is a relevant public figure, and if he were to say something along the lines of "the bastard deserved it" he'd face a ton of consequences for it? This is so much easier to do in an online space where you are anonymous, especially in an admittedly echochambery place like lemmy.
I do recall the Trump's first assassination attempt, and some celebrities (can't recall the names right now) did come out and say something along the lines of "shame the guy missed" which made the media start hounding and targeting them, with their colleagues being forced to disavow or kick them from their projects entirely.
It would be cool if Tim Walz or any influential figure went "rip bozo" regardless though
Damn that's tough bro, unlucky
Conflicted if this is actually good.
On one hand, Twitter has become a real neo-nazi platform that openly spreads misinformation/propaganda/rage-bait in the guise of 'free speech' with the owner also abusing their powers by stealing handles and censoring and whatnot. The world would be better off without it if it were to die.
On the other, Twitter is still quite a big name with a lot of influence, with alternatives being much more niche. If every decent person was to leave the platform and all that's left are neo-nazis and "good-faith-neither-left-nor-right-people-who-always-strangely-support-the-right", it's just going to make recruitment much easier.
What years of anti-feminist propaganda does to a man
Paying a tribute to the feudal lord