Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
12
Comments
513
Joined
2 yr. ago

There is a positive correlation between how often I post and how poorly my life is going.

Moved to Icytrees@sh.itjust.works

  • This is a weird headline. Like eating out is a normal thing to do, we see it come up on the calendar and are just like "Nah, let's skip paying more for food today."

  • I might be a magnet for anomalies but every welder I know is either a woman or non-binary and gay as hell.

  • What a surprise the individual rights advocates only want to protect their rights.

    I hope this woman wakes up with a dick.

  • baptize me in hotdog water

    you and i both know

    the holy stuff won't take

    -nicky flowers

  • It's the longest version of the longest joke I could find.

  • Yes, you just described how a contract works. It's pretty clear you didn't read the whole point because that's the same thing I said but in worse terms.

    I'm done with this thread, but you have a good one.

  • I mean... they did take her work off the shelves. They did just make it harder to support her work.

  • Much of the article, and the headline of the article, are about the rules on public image not being unilaterally applied.

    I can't parse your last sentence.

  • She might have been contracted rather than an employee, and may have already completed her contract. But either way it's fuzzy. She could have grounds to dispute it, because:

    1. She wasn't acting as a representative of the company or it's views.
    2. She was using her independent social media account.
    3. Her sometimes incendiary, political social media presence was a known entity and apparently discussed, and might even be considered part of her brand, unless her contract outlined what she could and couldn't say for x amount of time after completing her contract.
    4. The book was already printed and shipped, their recall could be considered retaliation for her political views, since they don't apply the same rules across the board, and the recall would hurt her worse than them.
  • We have the freedom of speech to say the consequences are stupid and unreasonable.

  • A colloquialism used to justify bad things. I was agreeing with you and adding to the conversation.

  • "It was a different time." Wait, no. We still have pedophiles and it's terrible.

  • How crazy would it be if we found out he did it for love?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • As a former art student, yeah. I'm not eyeing up your dick, I'm furious at it because my paper is covered in eraser smudges and no matter what I do it ends up like beaker's nose.

  • Didn't say he was an enemy or a friend. He's a guy I don't know who shot someone I don't like.

  • Who knows. It's harmless drama if it's a marketing gimmick, or they could just be rivals playing off each other. Childish, sure, but spite can be motivating — the guy does make great quality products.

    Like James Randi and Uri Geller. Randi made a career out of debunking snake oil salesfolks but there was no question about how much he despised Geller.

  • I think it's a region thing, I wasn't blocked. Someone here posted a screenshot for those who can't get in.

  • Could be a vpn or location issue? It's just a listing for another super matte black this artist made to fuck with Anish.

  • I don't know where you got that idea.

    Your logic assumes there's only one light source, no atmospheric dispersion, light is a particle, and everything around the object is non-reflective. And it's moved to a white background, something we know reflects light.

    Edit: This sounds bitchier than I intended so I'm adding in: questions are great and I upvoted you for it.