Wow, that’s a sobering read. And comprehensive, and insightful. I hope this gets some attention and results in much needed improvements in that area.

Also check out Wordatro (https://store.steampowered.com/app/3140120/Wordatro/)! It’s well made and quite addictive.

As the saying goes, there is no war but class war.

I am emotionally invested in Sandy.

Reality is so woke.

Ok, this one is bleak.

Oh, this was an excellent read. Thanks for the link!

China owns a bit under a trillion USD of US Treasury bonds, that is to say, debt. If they decide to liquidate it, that’s enough to seriously affect the value of those bonds, and therefore the US’s ability to borrow more money, and from there, the value of the dollar.

That’s going to take a lot of engineering investment and I really, really hope they understand this and pull it off.

C’est un des rares instruments tradables pas régulés. Du coup, ouais, ça continue de se trader, et tant qu’il y a encore du monde pour continuer d’acheter, même un peu plus cher qu’hier, il y a du monde pour continuer de vendre.

Ah, that Techlicious link is a great find, thanks. It does lay out clearly what the theoretical concern is. That’s still a far cry from the “Google will start fingerprintint you” scenario that seems to have people up in arms.

Thanks for digging out this link, I really appreciate it.

Thanks – that’s an announcement about policy updates. I already read it and it says nothing about fingerprinting. The only change to underlying technologies it mentions is the use of e.g. trusted execution environments (the doc for which, per a further link, is in fact on github). Those seem to claim that they let announcers run ad campaigns through Google ads while keeping their campaign data provably locked away from Google. So, basically, all these links are about purported “privacy-enhancing” techs, and you’d be forgiven for taking that with an enormous grain of salt, but either way, nothing in there about fingerprinting.

The Guardian article basically paraphrases the Tuta one – or it’s the other way around, maybe – but does also not provide actual sources.

I just want a source on what fingerprinting Tuta is claiming Google will start using. I feel like the details of the purported fingerprinting techniques should be front and center to this discussion and I’m frustrated that the article entirely fails to provide that info.

I’m aware of fingerprinting techniques, thank you. The article is claiming that Google will start using some of those and I’m looking for the source for that claim, hopefully with specifics about which techniques are involved. Confusingly, the article does not appear to provide such a source.

You’d THINK the article would link to a source about the fingerprinting in question instead of 90% filler slop and ads for their own service… Anyone got a link?

Chat, I don’t feel this guy gets it.

(❤️)

(By which I mean, of course you could, same as you could replace any pronoun with one or several nouns, that being the entire deal with pro-nouns. We could but pronouns save us from having to do that.)

Or the Dodgy. I’m partial to that one.

My fav neopronoun by far:

Chat.

That, now, is indeed a genuine issue. Trump has stated that his end game is annexation, and experience has shown that when he sounds like he’s got a bee in his bonnet about something, however bonkers, he’s actually serious about it. So I’m not seeing him stop the aggression on Canada.

which I’m sure we did somehow

Trudeau sold him measures that Canada had already voted on. See this post from the end of last year. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2024/12/the-government-of-canadas-border-plan-significant-investments-to-strengthen-border-security-and-our-immigration-system.html

Trudeau “caved” by giving Trump essentially zilch, apparently assuming – perhaps not incorrectly – that Trump would be that easily swindled.

Nope? They (Colombia) got exactly what they wanted as far as In understand. Trump caved, the flights will have to follow the conditions dictated by Colombia. It’s telling that the press is selling this as a Trump win.