• tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I know people may not like Adamsomething but I saw his video about these a while ago where you can do the same thing with a hydroelectric dam. Maybe you can’t implement those in some areas but using water instead makes a lot of sense

          • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I guess my thought is if you used water it could be hooked up to a larger reservoir and just pump from the water that’s there. Whereas the concrete used would serve no other purpose outside of energy storage.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, if you have a reservoir to pump from that could make sense as well. I’m guessing different regions would prefer different approaches based on what’s available. They do mention concrete is recycled, so it’s not like new concrete needs to be produced either.

    • orlando [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I saw Adamsomething’s video, where he reconstructed the concept of a reservoir piece by piece without saying that was his intention, and I made notes:

      -iron is denser than water or concrete

      -one crane and one mass is simpler

      -if you put it in a brick tower there’s no/less weathering

      -all of the above would make it low tech and could be built in urban areas instead of valleys for community storage