Does the source impact the message? This is the reality of a large part of the working class, so regardless where it comes from the truth is still the same
Then label it so. Indicate its a made-up source, as a tag in the title.
I have no problem with a message. But do you really think people would upvote this if they knew it was a “message” from ChatGPT or something, just to make this account a buck? Isn’t that a bit ironic, in this community?
Of course not. The Tweeter has already made their cash, and you’re dodging the point.
Its too late now (as the post has already made its rounds), but its about exposing Lemmy to a fake post.
It was a pretty simple choice. Do you value information hygiene and truthful presentation, or the message itself, more? Does the veracity of the source it comes from matter? Would you mislead Lemmy viewers if it’s for the right message?
Does the source impact the message? This is the reality of a large part of the working class, so regardless where it comes from the truth is still the same
Then label it so. Indicate its a made-up source, as a tag in the title.
I have no problem with a message. But do you really think people would upvote this if they knew it was a “message” from ChatGPT or something, just to make this account a buck? Isn’t that a bit ironic, in this community?
You think screen shots make money?
Of course not. The Tweeter has already made their cash, and you’re dodging the point.
Its too late now (as the post has already made its rounds), but its about exposing Lemmy to a fake post.
It was a pretty simple choice. Do you value information hygiene and truthful presentation, or the message itself, more? Does the veracity of the source it comes from matter? Would you mislead Lemmy viewers if it’s for the right message?
And it seems you answered that with your choice.
You are presenting a genetic fallacy