• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    We shall have to agree to disagree then. Calling a healthcare system that doesn’t cover all available healthcare universal just doesn’t make sense.

    I can accept that’s what people call it, but that’s about it.

    I think they’re wrong.

    By this logic the USA has universal healthcare, because a hospital must treat you for emergency, life-saving care, even if you’re unable to pay.

    So, the definition is absurd if it’s just that a system covers everyone.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The definitions I’ve seen mention the ability for anyone to receive medical care without fear of financial hardship. Which I guess also isn’t a perfect definition.