• Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        Makes about as much sense as people who think bisexuality excludes trans and enbys

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          “Bi-” doesn’t exclude them, but “pan-” exists to explicitly include them. Those aren’t the same thing.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Its a meaningless distinction. We have more important fucking things to fight than whether or not you like old Queer terminology.

        • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I once knew a lady who thought pansexual meant “everything,” and specifically actual animals. I had to explain that it’s just bisexual but more.