• geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean …sort of all of it (“Do you post the history of every news organization that lists pro-democrat articles as well?”) and the quantity as well. It’s pretty obvious you have no chill and freak out constantly in the comments. Must be exhausting.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So let me get this straight. A guy decided to post a history of the news org wrote the news article that I posted.

      I told him I thought was a strange response. He replied that he felt it was a biased news source and wanted to let everyone know.

      And I asked him if he did that for other articles as well. And you think me asking that is “weirdly defensive”?

      It’s pretty obvious you have no chill and freak out constantly in the comments

      Please show me one “freak out” that I have had? I reply to comments with the same tone that is offered to me. And many times, in a much nicer tone than is offered to me.

      Several comments that people have said to me have been removed, while mine have not. Doesn’t sound like the freak out is on my side.

      I’m not freak out at all or even upset by commenters on Lemmy. This is zero affect on my real life.

      You seem to know an awful lot about my comments and my so-called “freak outs.” Maybe you are reading a bit much into it, friend.

      Maybe you mistake my wordiness for freaking out. I type fast because I’m a writer. None of this takes up much of my time, nor troubles me.

      Let me guess tho: I’ve been very wordy in my response to you. So this is yet another example of my “weird defensiveness” and “freaking out.” Yes?

      • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Bwhahahahaha! Well done! Wow, you really went for it.

        Or if you were being serious - what a weirdly defensive reply. But that’s par for the course isn’t?

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well I do understand that it may take you a while to read all those words.

          But hey, I was right that you would think it was a weirdly defensive reply, so we can be friends now, right?

          Oh wait…crap! You probably think that this was a weirdly defensive reply too. Dammit! Oh man, we may not be able to break the cycle!

          • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well I do understand that it may take you a while to read all those words

            Wow, so uncivil! Now edging from “weirdly defensive” to just “weird”. Which - considering your post history lately - is on brand I suppose.

            • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              I was only assuming since you saw what I was saying as weirdly defensive and I couldn’t see any other reason you would think that. So I was incorrect? It wasn’t the amount of words that made me seem weirdly defensive then?

              Which - considering your post history lately - is on brand I suppose.

              You seem awfully interested in my post history. I feel so important now. Thank you!

              • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Interested? No. Just unwillingly subjected to your constant freakouts and weird defensiveness. Your shallow need to attack anything that gets posted in any thread you’re on. Your walls of text attempting to bludgeon others into acceptance, or at least submission. Your straw man arguments and other constant logical fallacies.

                Probably the worst case of main character syndrome I’ve ever seen. No one needs to go looking for your post history - it exists as a sickly miasma on everyone’s /all feed. And the funniest part is that you obviously think you’re so clever, and yet everything you do just makes people want to pay attention to anything you say less and less.

                In short - weird.

                • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Probably the worst case of main character syndrome I’ve ever seen. No one needs to go looking for your post history - it exists as a sickly miasma on everyone’s /all feed. And the funniest part is that you obviously think you’re so clever, and yet everything you do just makes people want to pay attention to anything you say less and less.

                  Sounds like you should really just block me then, since I get under your skin that much. Then you wouldn’t have to see my posts or my comments or put up with my “freakouts” and “weird defensiveness.”

                  So why haven’t you?

                  • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Because you don’t matter enough to bother blocking and I find your schtick to be somewhat amusing in how transparent it is.