Site takes no action over hate posts against UK politicians including Kemi Badenoch, Shabana Mahmood and Zia Yusuf
X has refused to take down dozens of social media posts reported as “hate, abuse or harassment” in which prominent UK politicians, including Kemi Badenoch, have been racially abused.
In May, researchers from the social inclusion thinktank British Future reported 30 posts from this year in which the Conservative party leader was called the N-word. In each case the researchers used the platform’s “hate, abuse or harassment” reporting option. X refused to act in the majority of cases, despite repeated requests.
The Guardian understands X routinely takes action only when posts are reported to it as illegal under the UK’s Online Safety Act. In those cases, it restricts visibility in the UK, leaving the post unrestricted in other jurisdictions.
This is why it’s stupid to use “n-word” and, in this case “p-word”, in a news article reporting what was said. The words, in the context of quoting another, should be spelled out, to present the full impact of the slur. The words are not offensive, they’re just words, it’s the context that gives them weight and meaning. I don’t know what the “p-word” is, and I’ve learned nothing from this article about it. I can’t avoid using a slur, or even recognizing a word as a slur, if I don’t know what it is.
I’ve learned, however, in social media sites, I can’t spell out the word, lest I be auto-banned from entire communities simply for stringing together those letters in that order, regardless of context. Bots don’t understand context, they just swing the ban hammer if they see the word.
Those who use slurs in hateful ways should NOT be given the consideration of sanitizing a word they said, in news reports quoting them. They should be quoted in full.
Yeah it’s giving off You-know-who vibes from Harry Potter.
I’ve never had an issue with reading the n-word, listening to NWA or watching Django Unchained. I do take issue with being told I “should go back to Jamaica”, but that doesn’t need sanitizing
And on the flip side, you could use only fancy words and yet, still attack and hate people.
You… pernicious nostril!
deleted by creator
Pretarded
Not spelling out the word isn’t about protecting the people who used it, it’s about sparing the people targeted by the slur from having to read it.
Referring to a word vs using it is the context.
If you don’t discuss these things openly you’re helping hide them. I assure you people from Pakistan know the word, and aren’t fragile. Better to openly discuss racism if you want a culture to deal with it, rather than preserve it.
Once the slur is discussed people can discuss how things got this way, rather than sneaking around on egg shells using hushed tones.
It’s not targeted at people from Pakistan particularly, it’s applied to anyone of vaguely South Asian appearance.
True.
Do either of these slurs apply to you?
Oh, are we going to go down the “Jews can’t be antisemitic” slide now?
A cultural problem needs multiple cultural influences to fix it. You can’t balkanize or ghettoize it, then walk away and say “well, that’s a problem for just those people, and their community to discuss”. All of a culture has to be against racism to make an antiracist culture.
Also, you’re not the gestapo of standpoint epistemology… And races themselves aren’t unified in opinions. Sometimes there’s a general unity, but because opinions do vary between individuals and from race to race… And because people of ANY race can be racist to ANY race (including their own) - we have to operate as a whole culture.
“What race are you to be talking about this?” whilst perhaps well meaning, may also be a kind of defensive use of racialization (standpoint epistemology).
When I say things like Pakistanis aren’t fragile to reading a word that’s not being said with offensive intentions (they do already know these slurs) I say that because I don’t believe anyone is so fragile that explaining the usage of a slur they already know is harmful.
…and if it is, they should take time away from such discussions to deal with that trauma, because like I say, ultimately you need a whole society to have healthy and mature attitudes towards being and becoming anti-racist.
May actually be:
Which I understand, but we have to move past these individual fears and problems if we’re going to solve the systemic cultural whole. Part of which is having and spreading THIS type of discussion to other people from an antiracist perspective, so thank you for helping and participating in that.
What in tarnation
(Eta: origin of tarnation. Just in case someone takes this troll seriously.)
Tarnation, and tar baby. I wouldn’t use them, not after that discussion.
In historical context they can be read as not racist, but I wouldn’t use them personally unless I’d already established an old timey southern character/context (which isn’t what we were up to just then).