• inari@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 days ago

      The upside:

      The strategic frame, in Jompy’s closing assessment: “The loss of the vast Soviet legacy stockpiles means the capability to quickly regenerate after high attritional warfare won’t be there anymore for Russia, and they’ll have to change their approach to mechanized warfare.” Russia is committing the recoverable end of its Cold War inheritance to this one war. There will not be another.

    • chocrates@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, but modern Russian tanks break down a lot, these ate going to be a nightmare. Plus the armor is so old munitions probably slice through them.

      Plus diesel is a problem all over Russia now.

      Still better for Ukraine if they weren’t there.

  • alapakala@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    They are bringing the literal archaic tankies
    。・゚(खਉख)・・。ヴァノヽノヽノヽノヽノヽノヽノヽ

  • cenariodantesco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Help me understand, if Russia is on the ropes, how come from time to time I see posts of articles, where Russia is building stuff near NATO borders, and the neighbour countries are preparing for possible hostility, with what? These bad boys?

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s a fair question. The thinking is they’ll stop here and rearm with their very active arms industry rather than throw their war economy into the shitter.

      There is no doubt they have squandered their USSR inheritance though.