Well that’s the thing I’m trying to say. It shouldn’t need to be enforced or checked (but yes, i support legislation) any more than putting pants on before going outside. But clearly, it’s fairly common behaviour to ignore basic rules.
I believe the government should have carte blanche to simply bypass constituonal rights that I deem inconvenient rather than following the established process to change them
Oh I agree, even if it was one with manual safeties I never kept one in the chamber, if I don’t have time to rack the slide I don’t have time to pull safely.
A lot of things have to go wrong. Yes, it’s illegal to drive with a loaded firearm, but this is basic firearm safety.
The person hit was a passerby.
which no one enforces or even checks.
Well that’s the thing I’m trying to say. It shouldn’t need to be enforced or checked (but yes, i support legislation) any more than putting pants on before going outside. But clearly, it’s fairly common behaviour to ignore basic rules.
You get fined and put on a list if you go donaldducking around.
Saying that is a bit like expecting politicians won’t be corrupt bcs of some decency & not because of consequences.
We pay taxes to get such things sorted out for us, so we don’t have to assemble French street furniture every few years.
(But I’m not exactly saying I know how to police dog gun safety habits.)
Not in the states at least. I assure you in real nations you will get at the very least a smack upside the head for this level of stupidity.
ShaLl nOt bE iNfrInGeD
– idiots
I believe the government should have carte blanche to simply bypass constituonal rights that I deem inconvenient rather than following the established process to change them
– bootlicking authoritarian idiots
You can have a firearm loaded if you have a carry permit most places.
Loaded is one thing but chambered is ignorant.
Oh I agree, even if it was one with manual safeties I never kept one in the chamber, if I don’t have time to rack the slide I don’t have time to pull safely.
Not in Nebraska