Oh dear…you know that the screenshot you posted speaks about… betrayal. You should look up Adrian Zenz. He’s not the source you should quote. He’s a member of an anti communist thinktank.
He’s not the source, he’s just an amusing messenger. The fact that 16 nations sent delegates to investigate and called bullshit on the US is an easily verifiable fact, and one that nobody pushing the Uighur genocide narrative ever has a good answer for.
it has to be a systematic, widespread extermination, or attempted extermination, of a national, racial, religious, or ethnic group. There are elements that are present in the Chinese case, but it’s not clear that the intent is to lead to the extermination of a particular ethnic group.
Well what? You don’t have to believe China is perfect to recognize that the Uighur genocide narrative is fictional
Oh dear…you know that the screenshot you posted speaks about… betrayal. You should look up Adrian Zenz. He’s not the source you should quote. He’s a member of an anti communist thinktank.
And about that
He’s not the source, he’s just an amusing messenger. The fact that 16 nations sent delegates to investigate and called bullshit on the US is an easily verifiable fact, and one that nobody pushing the Uighur genocide narrative ever has a good answer for.
Owkey… So, ‘‘all is queit on the Western front’’?
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/5/14/the-faux-anti-imperialism-of-denying-anti-uighur
https://bitterwinter.org/fake-uyghurs-v-genuine-uyghurs-in-the-hague-what-exactly-happened/
The only source that I find that tries to debunk the claim in depth is this one
https://medium.com/@braisedporkblog/debunking-the-uyghur-genocide-a-resource-list-a31dd0ea3d87
But maybe it is because of the interpretation of the word genocide?
https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-hasnt-the-un-accused-china-of-genocide-in-xinjiang