• GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s so lazy to assume any graphics are AI. A simple reverse igame search could have prevented this comment

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        A simple reverse igame search could have prevented this comment

        The fuck it would’ve. Either your screenshot is wrong or fabricated, and it’s telling you didn’t provide a link.

        A Facebook screenshot from Philosophical Thoughts account (same as watermark) from April 27, 2026

        You’ve seen the arms, and there’s no way you thought: “Yeah, surely a real human did that; I need to go investigate to prove it.” You can just admit it’s AI slop.


        Edit: Sorry, it was hypocritical to call out the lack of a URL and then not leave one myself (even if this gives all the info to find it). Here’s a link.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is too oversimplified (and the images are very anachronistic and stereotypical due to sloppiness)

    It lacks the role of the state as the force which regulates the tension between capitalists and proletariat.

  • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Whatever AI made this forgot the other class of people: useful idiots who have formed a dependence corporate technology and services for even the most basic tasks.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lazy to assume all graphics are AI. What ai existed in 2017 that would have produced these results?

  • Semjeza@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Denigration of the lumpenproleteriat… Those most excluded from the system are best able to imagine life beyond and outside it and build support networks not based in capitalism.

    Putting (some) of the workers in charge of the means of production doesn’t solve the problems, it merely ameliorates them for a while a new ruling class emerges from the revolutionary vanguard while switches places with the previous ruling class.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also glorifies work as an absolute moral good, when it’s long past time to be winding it down as automation takes the load. Why the fuck are average working hours going up?

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        While I agree hours probably shouldn’t be going up, I think there’s a bit of a ratcheting effect at play.

        If you take the classic “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”, you end up with the question of how you define ‘needs’.

        As tech gets better, the standard of care goes up in healthcare - treatments that were ‘impractical’ 20 years ago are now expected standard of care. Same goes for safety and for standard of living. Electric lighting, aircon, floor space, your own bedroom not shared with 3 other kids, TV/telephone/internet. It’s now basically standard in first world countries to fully treat sewage and have aircon on buses - that wasn’t the case 50 years ago.

        Every time automation displaces some drudge work, we’ll be able to find something new that technically could be done and would be nice to have. 30 years later people will be screaming bloody murder if that former nice-to-have breaks down.

        That’s certainly not to say we’re efficiently using the labour we have.

  • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What all theory, no history does to a mfer -

    You’ll be thinking the “Lumpen” are just expendable, based on Marx’s own prejudices instead of the most successful revolutionary class, within your arbitrary definitions.

    You know what? Go read some theory from the 21st century. Go read some Graeber.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The theory, regardless how old it is, remains unchanged. The same struggles we face today were the same struggles from 200 years ago

      • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If your theory does not adapt to reality as demonstrated by history, any claim of “scientific” socialism is just Capitalist Marketing.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          In socialism everyone that are able are expected to contribute. Those that choose not to contribute when they are able to are excluded. There are no freeloaders.

          Those that do not work do not eat.

            • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              We can’t have no e things because too many people defend capitalism and its exploitation. Which is wild because none of them have, and never will, any level of capital