Not OC, duh.

  • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That also makes no sense. Literally any large company could do great deals of harm even if they have countless competitors if they set out for the goal of just doing harm.

    There is a serious fundamental difference between a monopoly and a general market preference.

    If every single one of your competitors all decide to be stupid and you don’t you arnt a monopoly. You just are the only one not being stupid.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      That also makes no sense. Literally any large company could do great deals of harm even if they have countless competitors if they set out for the goal of just doing harm.

      Surely you understand that the amount of harm that a company with no serious competitors can do is much higher and longer lasting than the harm that a company with competitors can do.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If they start being stupid, they’re suddenly on par with the competitors already being stupid. Suddenly they have viable competitors.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A monopoly is when all competitors have been destroyed, not when competitors aren’t particularly competitive. At least, under the letter of US law.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Literally any large company could do great deals of harm

      Which is why there shouldn’t be any large companies.