• mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes I have enjoyed thinking about trolley problems since like 2010 so I feel like a bit of a hipster with them. Your point is hilarious and true. The entire thing the trolley problem is supposed to illustrate is how difficult-to-impossible it is to make a decision even in the literal trolley problem situation. Its supposed to be a fun intuition pump that shows how moral decisions are not straightforward. Yet seemingly for large groups of people the takeaway is that moral decisions are extremely straightforward because you just do what you already want to do, and also you have full authorship over the situation and its outcome for some reason. Man… I never realized how ironic that is that people are getting exactly the opposite lesson out of it. Hilarious.

    I’ve had people on here tell me I have blood on my hands and AM a baby murderer due to not voting Kamala. I pointed out that, just like them, I am trying to pick a lesser evil in the short term for a long term greater good, but just over a longer frame of time and a larger group of people than they took under consideration, which really means that they’re the bigger bloody handed child murderer according to their method of assigning guilt, and they’re just selfishly limiting their scope of concern to people they know here and now.

    I got no response from them, and someone else just called me a stupid asshole. 🤷

    • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly - the claims of “harm reduction” make people feel smart, but ignore opportunity cost and that there’s elections in the future as well.