A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agoPolitical compasslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square47linkfedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down141
arrow-up147arrow-down1imagePolitical compasslemmy.dbzer0.comA404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agomessage-square47linkfedilink
minus-squareYliaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·1 month agoThe state will never dissolve itself.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 month agoPerhaps, that theory may be incorrect. That doesn’t change the definition of communism as stateless, though.
minus-squareYliaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoDefinitions don’t mean anything if they don’t represent how it functions in practice
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoIf it isn’t stateless, it isn’t communism in practice. The various “communist” parties have called themselves that because it was their stated end goal, not because they actually practiced the concept.
minus-squareYliaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoMany MLs believe that communism ends on a stateless goal but that it requires a state to get there Is that not true?
The state will never dissolve itself.
Perhaps, that theory may be incorrect. That doesn’t change the definition of communism as stateless, though.
Definitions don’t mean anything if they don’t represent how it functions in practice
If it isn’t stateless, it isn’t communism in practice. The various “communist” parties have called themselves that because it was their stated end goal, not because they actually practiced the concept.
Many MLs believe that communism ends on a stateless goal but that it requires a state to get there
Is that not true?