‘Despite all of that talk, Carney’s actual agenda is about moving Canada closer and closer to the U.S. militarily.’
This is another reason why we need transparent supply chains (which is technically perfectly possible if and when there is political will) and supposedly more domestic production of critical goods in Canada and other democracies.
Unfortunately, a few countries oppose such transparency - notably China, named by the EU a ‘decisive enabler’ of Ruusia’s war against Ukraine.
It’s perfectly alright to criticize Canada for this, but it’s grossly hypocritical imo as such media are calling out Ottawa for this but remain silent on China’s much stronger support for Russia and other dictatorships.
How is this different from Carney’s stated agenda?
He said he wants to increase domestic defence production, instead of purchasing from the USA. I dont see anything contrary to that in this article.
Also, there needs to be timelines associated with awarding contracts to make a link between Carney/Federal statements and how these are shaking out.
Finally, Canada is a federation, provinces still get a vote in how these things shake out; we’ve seen that before with General Dynamics / Ontario and seeling vehicles to Saudi Arabia



