• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Starting at $1750, they’re competing with surpassing Apple in the price department

    (Edit: added right price)

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      28 days ago

      And

      To get the best battery life, you’ll need to settle for 1920 x 1200

      On a 16 inch screen that’s gross

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        To be fair to Dell, Apple’s high-resolution displays might have toned-down resolutions too. The Mac Neo ships with a lower default resolution than what it can fully handle, if I understand the settings right.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Still 219 PPI compared to 146 PPI at 500 nits brightness for $500. Granted that iPad chip is going to crawl on some stuff. and the MacBook Air, which is likely far more performant than either is $1099 base instead of $1700+ for the dell. I enjoy all competition but intel chips are still way less performant than the m series in terms of power consumption

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        28 days ago

        People don’t understand that Apple just never chose to compete in the $500 laptop range, until, well, this year…

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          The least expensive current-gen MacBook after the Neo is $1100 (less if you buy a previous generation, which is apparently common practice); the Dell in the article is $1750.

          Apple’s other products are expensive, but this is a whole new level of it.