I’ve been generally doing this anyway, though am now upgrading to an official vow. May this be for the benefit of all beings.

I’ve never used to write for me, and clearly state if/when sharing AI-content. I’ve given ample permission to Coyote to affect my speech/thoughts/actions, and believe a lot of my writing is sourced from him. I think Coyote should be more tolerated, and urge cessation of mass-killing (or any killing) of coyotes qua animal.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    You’ve said delusion is always bad. But you’ve also set up your position so that nothing could ever count as evidence against it. if Coyote acts, he’s real; if he doesn’t, he just hasn’t yet.

    That’s not the absence of delusion, that’s the definition of an unfalsifiable belief.

    I’m not asking you to abandon your practice. I’m asking: what would it take to convince you that you were wrong? If the answer is “nothing,” then by your own standard, you’re in moha.

    • beumuth@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s descriptions & methods in religions that can be tested; schools to learn & try these things. You would have to ignore the e.g. hundreds of thousands of scriptures available to say there isn’t any evidence that can be tested. You have to know what something is before being able to falsify it. It can be taken just on a story-level too, and still be effective.

      I would like better opportunity to practice.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        You still haven’t answered the question. I didn’t ask what evidence exists for your position, I asked what evidence would count against it.

        Those are different questions.

        • beumuth@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          There’s plenty of information & methods available that can be tested or scrutinized. If they fail or are contradictory, that can be disconfirming.

          • Zozano@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            so what would a failed test look like, specifically? If someone follows the methods sincerely and doesnt experience a deity, does that count? or would you say they didn’t try hard enough?