• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The proletariat in China are already empowered, comrade.

      Ah, through the magic of The People’s Billionaires and The People’s Capitalist State, of course

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Please do yourself a favor and spend an hour reading this. Then either come up with a better argument or accept that you’re wrong.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Read my agitprop or I won’t discuss this with you.

          Lmao, enjoy sitting alone in silence then 🤷

          • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Agitprop is usually a poster or something short and memorable. This is a well written and sourced essay on the topic at hand.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s excruciating to read. Why would someone take an hour to read this as an answer to that comment? Only near the end does it conclude the whataboutism and try to address why “socialism” produces hundreds of billionaires.

          Apparently, “it’s fine because the proles have public transit and stuff.” Perhaps magical thinking seems compelling if it is disguised in an expensive vocabulary and hiding behind many citations.

          • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            “China has billionares therefore it’s not socialism” is not an argument. It’s a thought-terminating cliche. The essay is an in-depth examination of why China should be considered socialist, and is therefore a direct refutation of that sentiment.

            You keep saying it’s “whataboutism”. That’s another of those thought-terminating cliches, and you would do well to stop using it to dismiss every argument that makes you uncomfortable.