not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 个月前paniclemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1581arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1572arrow-down1imagepaniclemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 个月前message-square30linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·2 个月前Anyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds. That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 个月前Kids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 个月前That’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
minus-squareChakravanti@monero.townlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Possession of money is literally the definition of scammed.
Anyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds.
That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
Kids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
That’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
Possession of money is literally the definition of scammed.