• Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    They are required to pander to voters. That’s why Biden disappeared no matter how much he wanted to GenocideJoe2024.

    It’s just that most voters care more about their candidate being old than them being complicit in Genocide.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I usually agree with you, Linker. But definitely not here. Lobbying and AIPAC money are the crux of this situation. If it were still illegal bribery, like it actually is in reality, the denial would not be existent.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          That is a rare case of listening to constituents. You are right. Usually, they listen to donors over voters.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s not a rare case they had no choice. Biden was a guaranteed loss.

            Losing just 5% of voters makes enough of a difference for the Democrats to change policy.

            They listen to their donors, but in the end they cannot do that if they don’t get enough votes to get in power.