• maplesaga@lemmy.worldBanned from communityOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Well we had a large demand for workers when inflation was high, because there was a lot of new money supply created via cheap borrowing and QE. That money floods the economy and leads to shortages in labor. It also leads to rising asset prices as things are bid up, housing and gold are a good example.

    But as we raise interest rates employment falls, as money supply is sucked from the economy. Now the employment shortage has reverted to the mean. Saying its automation seems silly when we can see the money supply growth, and its doing exactly what it meant to, you sound like Elon Musk trying to shill an LLM.

    The people we brought in were less educated, as per the Trudeau himself, hence its not creating new industries or exports. Which is what countries typically due, attracting high skilled immigrants that efficiently increase exports and productivity, and lead to higher per capita standards of living. Which we had the reverse of this, as per capita GDP fell and Caroline rogers is ringing the alarm bells on productivity:

    https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/politics/canada-to-restrict-low-wage-foreign-workers-consider-lower-immigration-targets/article_7d63ebf2-e016-5bc6-aa16-6aa63b61c562.html

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I’m not sure why you’re looking at Canada in isolation when the tariffs introduced by Trump have been the biggest shock to the Canadian economy in the past year. It seems that you really want to attrubute this to immigration / inviting temporary foreign workers (beyond Canada’s capacity) and, while that is a factor, I think Canada having its bestie (who gobbled up 70% of its exports) stab it in the back is a more logical explanation as to why unemployment has rise recently.

      Immigration is going to be crucial to Canada’s growth story especially based on current local population trends. Canadian universities like UofT, McGill, UBC have already signed agreements in countries like India to create centers of excellence/innovation campuses in emerging markets with more favorable demographic skews (ie. more young participants in the workforce vs retirees) and it would be ill thought out of Canada to not offer those that attend these transnational education institutions preferable conditions to immigrate to Canada.

      • maplesaga@lemmy.worldBanned from communityOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Per capita GDP has been falling for a decade. We had the second to last per capita GDP in the 38 countries of the OECD the last decade. Its been a problem long before tariffs.

        Mass immigration into a housing shortage benefits who? Definitely not renters or non-asset holders, so what kind of regressive policy is it?

        I’d be fine with it if we built the housing and infrastructure first, and there was a real labor shortage caused by more than just inflation.

        • liuther9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          100% of your problems could have been solved if we had max cap networth and 100% taxes above that cap.

          • maplesaga@lemmy.worldBanned from communityOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Ya maybe, if you could stop investment from fleeing Canada; only because it would drastically raise inflation and interest rates, which would make mortgages far more expensive. Of course anyone with a large mortgage would be made poorer.

            • liuther9@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yeah you are right, forgot about price ceiling part. Gov should be regulating lots of things compared to the situation now. Though infinite wealth cap is the main solution. It is like joining an online game 1 lvl where many players are 1000000+ lvl. The system itself is unfair and we need 100 lvl max

              • maplesaga@lemmy.worldBanned from communityOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                Well I’d just ask does the aggregation of nominal wealth affect you in any way. If Bill Gates has 800b dollars does that hurt you, is that money being taken from somebody else, even when the money supply grows at 8% because Bill Gates and other rich people dont spend any of it so inflation doesnt rise?

                • liuther9@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Yes? Redistribution, creating more jobs, social programs, positive effect on mental health. Inflation on what? Lets say meat becomes super expensive. Shop wont be able to extract all this wealth if progressive taxes eats it up then again distribute that and create med facilities, spend that on rnd, education. List goes on.

                  • maplesaga@lemmy.worldBanned from communityOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    How do you think that would effect the economy. Assuming you liquidated Elon Musks Tesla stock it clearly will devalue Tesla stock as more stocks are sold off to fund consumption, which will deflate risky growth stocks far faster than consumer staple. Why would anyone then invest in AI, or Tesla, or anything risky that generates additional profit?