To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type
I should add Reasons:
Liberals are more or less powerless. they’re just a fruit that’s being used to syphon resources out of. It’s not productive to hate them, there’s no reason to manufacture hate towards them, people who are effected by their inactions already hate them. That’s what’s so difficult about it.
People are shaped by their material reality, you turn your material reality into digging up pits, you ideologically become a Nazi, because of the material reality created. Our purpose is to destroy camps not build them.
I dissuade Party members from putting down people who do not understand. Even people who are unenlightened and seemingly bourgeois should be answered in a polite way. Things should be explained to them as fully as possible. I was turned off by a person who did not want to talk to me because I was not important enough. Maurice just wanted to preach to the converted, who already agreed with him. I try to be cordial, because that way you win people over. You cannot win them over by drawing the line of demarcation, saying you are on this side and I am on the other; that shows a lack of consciousness. After the Black Panther Party was formed, I nearly fell into this error. I could not understand why people were blind to what I saw so clearly. Then I realized that their understanding had to be developed.
— Huey P. Newton
Look I am really angry at a lot of people myself. I’ve lost friends I cared about.
But that’s just not how dialectical-materialism works. We don’t take a concept like GULAG, which is an acronym basically meaning HQ of Labor Camps and that’s what it should be translated to. Labor Camps. We don’t take that and try to see who we can fit into there, we look at problems and try to figure out solutions. Are you trying to solve labor shortage? Are you trying to educate people by making them work?
You can’t teach someone to think independently by threats or force, if they spit in your face ironically they probably have a better chance of rehab than someone who nods along and follows everything you say, on the inside they’ll be plotting to destroy you when they get out. You think you’ve created an awesome citizen by force look how nice they can follow all your orders, in reality what you did is dig your own grave.
To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type
I should add Reasons:
Liberals are more or less powerless. they’re just a fruit that’s being used to syphon resources out of. It’s not productive to hate them, there’s no reason to manufacture hate towards them, people who are effected by their inactions already hate them. That’s what’s so difficult about it.
People are shaped by their material reality, you turn your material reality into digging up pits, you ideologically become a Nazi, because of the material reality created. Our purpose is to destroy camps not build them.
I dissuade Party members from putting down people who do not understand. Even people who are unenlightened and seemingly bourgeois should be answered in a polite way. Things should be explained to them as fully as possible. I was turned off by a person who did not want to talk to me because I was not important enough. Maurice just wanted to preach to the converted, who already agreed with him. I try to be cordial, because that way you win people over. You cannot win them over by drawing the line of demarcation, saying you are on this side and I am on the other; that shows a lack of consciousness. After the Black Panther Party was formed, I nearly fell into this error. I could not understand why people were blind to what I saw so clearly. Then I realized that their understanding had to be developed.
— Huey P. Newton
What about Gulags?
Look I am really angry at a lot of people myself. I’ve lost friends I cared about.
But that’s just not how dialectical-materialism works. We don’t take a concept like GULAG, which is an acronym basically meaning HQ of Labor Camps and that’s what it should be translated to. Labor Camps. We don’t take that and try to see who we can fit into there, we look at problems and try to figure out solutions. Are you trying to solve labor shortage? Are you trying to educate people by making them work?
You can’t teach someone to think independently by threats or force, if they spit in your face ironically they probably have a better chance of rehab than someone who nods along and follows everything you say, on the inside they’ll be plotting to destroy you when they get out. You think you’ve created an awesome citizen by force look how nice they can follow all your orders, in reality what you did is dig your own grave.
Naah, reeducation is crucial for these people. Historically, they are the first ones to sell us to the fascists.