• KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s more akin to the US claiming the ex confederate southern states (which it does), and other countries being “strategically ambiguous” and selling the Confederate remnants weapons and promoting their independence while officially recognizing the US/Washington

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Greenland as strategig against Rusia and China is anyway a stupid argument, due tthat Alaska is separated by 4 km from Rusia, in cold winters you can go walking from the US to Rusia, and China has only commercial trading interests with other countries, not imperialistic ones, like this orange piece of shit.

            • Zerush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Even with missiles there isn’t any reason to invade Greenland, apart of a NATO member, there is already an US Base there since 50 years. No, Rusia and China are not the reason, but rare earth in Greenland are, like in Venezuela the oil, not the democracy… The next is Panama and Canada in the expansions plan “to make America great again” (and the paria for the rest of the world).

          • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Distance from the eastern most part of Russia to Moscow is 6300 km. It is literally on the other side of the planet, the longitude seperation is almost 200 degrees.

            Do you know what that means? It is faster to go from Alaska through Canada, the Atlantic ocean, then through Europe to get to Moscow than it is to go by the eastern side of Russia.