• plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Clinton was impeached but not removed. I have a hard time to believe that they would remove her for a war they want. If they impeach her for starting an illegal war, don’t they also deny themselves from ever doing it?

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wouldn’t mind to be wrong but nobody who is making your point has named the transgression that Republicans would use to impeach her, nor had there ever been somebody during the election campaign who had mentioned that the campaign was useless because Harris would be impeached anyway.

          Trump is worse, but Harris would fight the same wars because the president is a figurehead and politics is made by the lobbyists.

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              but i dont have time to explain the difference between a clinton bj and a harris land invasion

              That’s not the question. Why would the Republicans try an impeachment for an invasion if the Republicans obviously want that war. You also have to explain how they could get 67 votes for a successful impeachment.

              Who is the influencer that is spreading the idea? It’s surprising how many democrats believe it since cooperation from democrats is needed for it to succeed.