• Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, but it takes years of full time labor in a time where most human labor had to be spent on subsistence. That a community at that low tech level would feed and house someone doing something decorative for that many years is really cool. And I guess to some not believable.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      that’s the thing though, humans spent the most time on just baseline survival during the agricultural revolution.
      Hunter-gatherers actually have quite a lot of downtime, since they’d generally travel to follow food sources and thus food was readily available to them. There’s also very clear archaeological evidence of hunter-gatherers straight up carrying and hand-feeding people who would have been completely unable to care for themselves due to severe injuries, so clearly they weren’t opposed to “wasting” efforts.

      • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Charity food and health care is generally accepted as a good thing. By contrast, the idea of some kind of UBI (universal basic income) as a floor - where a person could have food and housing while pursuing a dream like creating art - is widely opposed (“paid work gives dignity!”).

        Disbelief that our distant ancestors paid labor “taxes” to support artists in their community (which they definitely did) might be some psychological projection.