black0ut@pawb.social to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThey had a paid break, right?pawb.socialimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageThey had a paid break, right?pawb.socialblack0ut@pawb.social to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareGork@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 year agoAt least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
minus-squarenoddy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 year agoIt will go brrrrrrrt¤gdføTJwrgt65&<)5½$¥[[¥½{2ahgfh Segmentation fault (core dumped)
minus-square30p87@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoIf you know that you do. What you probably do not. A proper C/C++ compiler (gcc) will almost always produce better/more optimized ASM than a human ever could.
minus-squareℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕪@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoI always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoA pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
minus-squareUnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoit reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
At least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
It will go brrrrrrrt¤gdføTJwrgt65&<)5½$¥[[¥½{2ahgfh Segmentation fault (core dumped)
If you know that you do. What you probably do not. A proper C/C++ compiler (gcc) will almost always produce better/more optimized ASM than a human ever could.
Assuming it actually works
I always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
A pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
My assembly code only goes brt :(
it reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
Maybe you switched up
jgandjl?/s