Canada just lost its measles-free status. So here’s the question…

If an unvaccinated child spreads measles to someone else’s kid, why shouldn’t the parents be liable in small-claims court?

I’m not talking about criminal charges, just basic responsibility. If your choice creates the risk you should have to prove you weren’t the reason someone else’s child got sick.

Is that unreasonable?

  • 🇾 🇪 🇿 🇿 🇪 🇾@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t disagree with this mindset, but I do want to say that it should be on the plaintiff to prove your child caused the problem rather than the defendant to prove they did not. Proving a negative is damn near impossible in court.

    If your choices raise everyone else’s risk, it’s fair that you carry some of the burden. Courts deal in probability every day.