skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 8 个月前China Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square63linkfedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 8 个月前message-square63linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 个月前 I obviously don’t see the need in this case. It’s not prose but facts. Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 个月前In the same way that the words you are reading right now are not imaginary.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 个月前There’s a difference between opinions and facts.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 个月前When the topic is ideas then ideas are facts.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 个月前And you think this book contains facts about ‘the structure of the war’?
Since you “obviously don’t see the need” to read it, yet still feel the need to regularly cite it, I’d like to know which facts from this book you are talking about.
The concepts
They are facts to you?
In the same way that the words you are reading right now are not imaginary.
There’s a difference between opinions and facts.
When the topic is ideas then ideas are facts.
Which topic?
The structure of the war.
And you think this book contains facts about ‘the structure of the war’?