• Sorgan71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it might be the clinical word vagina vs wee wee, but vajayjay still would be weird in this context. Honestly, dont show strangers your kids genitals.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, all genitals seem weird to show people. I don’t even show them to my parents. I tried not to take them at all, and instead tried to take a few with angles that obscured any private areas. I think my parents have seen a couple of those, but I don’t even send them.

      Perhaps the comic is from the mindset 40 years ago. I could easily see parents of that era doing this and thinking it was fine.

      • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I was wondering why you are showing your nudes to your parents and then I realized you are talking about your own kids

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think home photography was still pretty new 30-40 years ago, might be why some families were weirdly oversharing with baby photos? Idk.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think it’s more that adults sexualizing children wasn’t considered a frequent risk, people didn’t think anyone they knew would look at babies that way. Gen X parents really shifted a lot in terms of culture in the US, under their generation child sexual abuse cases have dropped significantly, and that’s adjusting to unreported numbers.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            under their generation child sexual abuse cases have dropped significantly

            If this is true, that’s really impressive. I’ve heard how insanely widespread all kinds of abuse used to be through history, often even openly. But if the culture shift was really as sharp as this seems to suggest, I’d be worried it could go almost just as fast back in the other direction.

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          I can’t say world wide, but in the U.S., home photography was not new 30-40 years ago. I was a kid 30 year ago and I had real camera and various disposable ones over time. Maybe home videography was becoming more common 30-40 years ago, but photography had been around.

      • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        At first I thought you were talking about your own genitals. It really confused me when you wrote about not taking them. Or only at angles.

        I was like, was there a choice? Could I have chosen to have no genitals? Or ones with different angles?