• xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    So, it’s basically just the same story with a few additional colors. Whatever.

    Also, I’m going to repeat the same critique I had when the trailer for the water one came out. The animation and visual effects are impressive, but they aren’t meaningfully more impressive than the first one. So, you’ve got basically the same story, with basically the same characters, in basically the same environment, with basically the same production value. I just don’t understand the appeal of this franchise.

    That being said, I hope fans enjoy the movie.

    • BzzBiotch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Your critique has no dominion here, Lemming. /s Big fan of the franchise. Just want some escapism for a few hours.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    So question: there is already a lot of people who end up confusing James Cameron’s Avatar movies with Avatar: The Last Airbender. Now with the Cameron movies going into this sort of 4 elements theming, which is the entire basis of the ATLA series, does the rightsholder of Avatar: The Last Airbender (not sure if it’s the original creators, Nickelodeon, or Netflix at this point) have a case to go after James Cameron for trademark infringement?