D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months ago

Scientists propose converting natural gas into hydrogen directly in gas fields

techxplore.com

external-link
message-square
67
fedilink
125
external-link

Scientists propose converting natural gas into hydrogen directly in gas fields

techxplore.com

CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months ago
message-square
67
fedilink
Skoltech researchers have found a way to produce hydrogen from natural gas with 45% efficiency right in the gas field by injecting steam and a catalyst into a well and adding oxygen to ignite the gas. Catalyst-assisted combustion produces a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, from which the latter can be easily extracted. This technology will help accelerate the transition from fossil fuels to clean hydrogen power. The study was published in Fuel.
  • ianovic69@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The alternatives are the status quo or severely restricting natural gas extraction. I won’t say the latter isn’t doable, especially if we can ramp up nuclear power capacity, but there’s a lot of baggage there. We should welcome a solution that effectively makes natural gas an emissions-free resource.

      • ianovic69@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Delta_V@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also, its probably safe to assume the producers will lie about how much they’re allowing to leak into the air.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’re cheating by using trends to predict this. :-p

        • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t understand what you mean. As described in the article, the process leaves the CO trapped in the ground.

          • ianovic69@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not sure what direction to point you in. Gas storage in geological formations has been successfully practiced in the helium and natural gas industries for a while. Subterranean storage of carbon dioxide has also been successfully demonstrated. Apparently, there’s a big gas field being used for this purpose off the coast of Norway since 1996.

              • ianovic69@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                deleted by creator

                • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m unaware of any examples of subterranean carbon monoxide storage. However, underground helium storage has been done successfully for a while. Helium is one of the best gases at leaking because of its small size, which should provide some reassurance as to the storage of larger gases underground.

                  I agree that greed and corporate malfeasance are a thing, but it’s kind of a separate problem. The government is either going to enforce environmental regulations and manage our resources properly or it’s not.

                  • ianovic69@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    deleted by creator

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I won’t say the latter isn’t doable, especially if we can ramp up nuclear power capacity

        We could do both and hedge our bets.

        • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes. I mean, I don’t think we’re getting anywhere without a war economy build-out of nuclear power capacity regardless.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.6K users / day
  • 9.49K users / week
  • 17.8K users / month
  • 37.6K users / 6 months
  • 22 local subscribers
  • 69.9K subscribers
  • 11.2K Posts
  • 413K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org