Derives from ricing cars. Ricing cars derives from “rice burner”, where it was common to take an inexpensive, Asian-made car for modding. The pejorative nature kind of got lost somewhere along the way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_burner
Rice burner is a pejorative term originally applied to Japanese motorcycles and which later expanded to include Japanese cars or any East Asian-made vehicles.[2][3][4][5] Variations include rice rocket, referring most often to Japanese superbikes, rice machine, rice grinder or simply ricer.[3][6][7]
T-Mobile’s 1985 Corolla Sport GT-S coupé “Poser Mobile” advertisements exploited ethnic stereotypes and stereotypes of customized East Asian cars as failed imitations of “authentic” car culture
Riced out is an adjective denigrating a badly customized sports car, “usually with oversized or ill-matched exterior appointments”.[8] Rice boy is a US derogatory term for the driver or builder of an import-car hot rod.[4] The terms may disparage cars or car enthusiasts as imposters or wanna-bes, using cheap modifications to imitate the appearance of high performance.
It makes sense to increase taxes or something if a city has more tourism than is desired and wants to reduce it — some cities in Europe have imposed various forms of taxes on tourists recently, when they’ve had more tourism than the locals are willing to put up with. Makes sense then, since it’s a finite resource being consumed.
I kind of doubt that Los Angeles is in that position, but I dunno what the politics are behind that, and I guess it could be the case.
In Europe’s case, my guess is that one could restructure the cities for more tourism throughout — Orlando, Florida, does more people a year than even the much-more-populous Paris, which is the top destination in Europe.
https://www.visitorlando.org/media/press-releases/post/orlando-welcomed-753-million-visitors-in-2024/
https://roadgenius.com/statistics/tourism/france/paris/
But Orlando was also designed around being a tourist destination, and a lot of the cities in Europe upset about tourism load weren’t and I’d guess don’t want to redesign around it.
EDIT: I’d also add that Los Angeles County has been shrinking in population for a while, so I’d be hesitant to impose more costs in their specific case. Let me go find a graph.
kagis
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/losangelescountycalifornia/PST120224#PST120224
Yeah, lower than it was in 2010, even.