• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I believe most people want to contribute, but our society isn’t set up to align individual interest and aptitude with need.

    If we’re asking the majority of people to grind their own bones into dust doing something they hate for a pittance, that’s a large part of the problem. Some people love cleaning (like my sister), others love woodworking or cooking or streaming. But we’re forcing square pegs into round holes because we give no thought whatsoever to how people’s skills, aptitude, and interest might align with society’s needs, then we’re shocked pikachu when most are unhappy and thus unproductive.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      Work in the context I meant was definitely the type that results from the current hierarchy resulting in the categorical failure you’re pointing out.

      Contributing to someone you meet and relate face to face to feels good. Contributing to the concept of company or the “stakeholder” not so good.

      Personally i like to do a little of everything but forced myself to learn a specialty to earn a livable wage.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 days ago

        In that case, I guess I agree with him that most people don’t want to ‘work’. Wanting to be a wage slave would be bonkers. Most people want to contribute meaningfully to society and don’t want to starve, but that’s not what ‘work’ means.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Right, it should just mean paid labor, but the people complaining about this would prefer it unpaid.

          I’d prefer pay to be unnecessary and the labor voluntary. At least I think that’s a good ideal to work towards.