cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31072292
Summary:
I downvoted pro-AI comments in a post in leftymemes community. It was LLM generated polandball comic (Which is objectively pathetic as fuck) that showed up on my feed, blocked couple of users who I thought were unhinged, and have blocked the whole instance on my client after realizing how rabid these morons are.
I didn’t go looking for AI posts like a vigilante.
One user in question got miffed for being downvoted and banned me from places they moderate.
I said ‘i find im wrong sometimes’
But this reads like ‘not all men’ so im gonna spare myself the rest of your comment.
I’m attempting good faith discussion on something I find interesting, but you do you.
I told you how arguing about this with enthusiasts who don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about has effected me, and you’re still trying to tell me how your cool toy is actually magic tho.
You’re "not all men"ing me about my problem with people who “not all men” about their fucking favorite toy. Not even the first in this thread to do it.
That’s like three layers of the oblivious piece of shit version of, like, reverse FLN recursion; a kind of active anti-consciousness.
I’m not I just want you to actually explain your position instead of hand waiving away large swaths of people as idiots, but if you’re just going to grandstand I don’t really see a point and we should just stop here.
I don’t owe you shit though.
If you’re actually curious, and don’t just want to harass me about it, there are ways you could find out without bugging me, which i said in pretty strong terms i dont love to discuss. Simple, easy ways. Really really strong terms.
But this isn’t even about the technology itself. This is about the scum who defend it. Its the ‘rick and morty’ of computers.
This is about you, and your recursive piece-of-shit-ness.
There’s 2 people here but only one behaving like scum.
You claim this is about how the technology is defended, and we both gave you pretty good arguments, i didn’t see any from you yet except neboluos accusations and a pretty uncalled for “not all men” quip. I was hoping for civil discourse here and that you can see that not everyone who uses this technology is a accelerationist crypto tech bro, and i only see one person here behaving like the thing you want to criticize - not open to arguments, passive-aggressive, resorting to ad hominem.
Maybe don’t talk to people who don’t know what the fuck they are talking about if they trigger you so much, but for sure don’t use the same measure if you are talking with people who know what the fuck they are talking about, that doesn’t suit you.
Read the thread again. Take a good look in the mirror. Your behavior here is out of line, and you know it.