• CBYX@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    No one needs more than 500sqft of living space per capital until poverty is eradicated

    War is absurd and the consequence of greed and senile, old, fucked up and immoral men

    Democracy doesn’t work without a limit on speech - specifically hate speech, authoritarianism, and ethnic superiority ideology

    Fascism is the greatest concern of the western world right now

    Genocide deserves instant disavowal and should convince any sane person to immediately support removing any government official or politician from office who doesn’t oppose it

    Black Lives Matter, and American history has treated black Americans awfully (see prison industrial complex)

    Housing isn’t an investment vehicle. Tax speculative purchasing of housing. Support government building high density housing like the HBD system in Singapore or Austria’s housing system

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That seems pretty reasonable, though I’m not sure it really scales linearly. My wife and I live in appx. 1000sqft, and that’s really plenty for us. An extra 500sqft seems about right when we have a kid, but another 500 for each additional kid would be excessive.

        • CBYX@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I gave it as an upper bound.

          E.g. 3500sqft for a 3-5 person family is way too large.

          Mansions are basically an immoral amount of waste/greed (in the realm of >1000sqft per person, or super rich person mansions in the realm of 10,000sqft per person)