archived (Wayback Machine)

A reminder folks: people engage in this kind of radical protest because it works:

Results of two online experiments conducted with diverse samples (N = 2,772), including a study of the animal rights movement and a preregistered study of the climate movement, show that the presence of a radical flank increases support for a moderate faction within the same movement. Further, it is the use of radical tactics, such as property destruction or violence, rather than a radical agenda, that drives this effect. Results indicate the effect owes to a contrast effect: Use of radical tactics by one flank led the more moderate faction to appear less radical, even though all characteristics of the moderate faction were held constant. This perception led participants to identify more with and, in turn, express greater support for the more moderate faction. These results suggest that activist groups that employ unpopular tactics can increase support for other groups within the same movement, pointing to a hidden way in which movement factions are complementary, despite pursuing divergent approaches to social change.

  • xyro@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    No lawyer, argue with the judge… Really didn’t help their case…

    • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      They shouldn’t even be in a court because any society that actually cares about health and climate justice would have already stopped the current airtravel system and also the use of taxis.

      And using the court room as an extension of their activism is a well known and often effective tactic (when you care about publicity). Most people who do this are aware of the consequences and deserve our solidarity because of their unjust treatment by this death cult of society we live in.