weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoAt least we're not mixing in letterssub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down11
arrow-up131arrow-down1imageAt least we're not mixing in letterssub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square56linkfedilink
minus-squarenaticus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWeird, I’ve seen many analog clocks with Roman numerals but always IV for 4.
minus-squaretopherclay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s actually called the “clockmakers four” or “watchmakers four.” it’s a thing.
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoFalse. I had a clock that used IIII instead.
minus-squarenaticus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYour clock having it doesn’t change that mine didn’t.
Weird, I’ve seen many analog clocks with Roman numerals but always IV for 4.
It’s actually called the “clockmakers four” or “watchmakers four.” it’s a thing.
False. I had a clock that used IIII instead.
Your clock having it doesn’t change that mine didn’t.