Jeena@piefed.jeena.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoWSL userspiefed.jeena.netimagemessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1700arrow-down141
arrow-up1659arrow-down1imageWSL userspiefed.jeena.netJeena@piefed.jeena.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-squarefolkrav@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8·23 hours agoPretty much my situation. Work stuff, Windows machine, but Linux/Docker workflow and I refuse to let go of my POSIX shell.
minus-squareLaser@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoAll the good stuff available and you choose a POSIX shell? To each their own I guess. Granted, I still prefer it to PowerShell, but only in how it feels, not conceptually.
minus-squarefolkrav@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-210 hours agoEh I’m not hard set on full spec compliance. I use ZSH, it’s not technically POSIX compliant but close enough that I virtually never have to think about it. Technically correct would probably have been “sh derivative” or something.
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours ago I still prefer it to PowerShell Who hurt you?
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 hours agoNot enough caffeine. Please disregard.
Pretty much my situation. Work stuff, Windows machine, but Linux/Docker workflow and I refuse to let go of my POSIX shell.
All the good stuff available and you choose a POSIX shell? To each their own I guess.
Granted, I still prefer it to PowerShell, but only in how it feels, not conceptually.
Eh I’m not hard set on full spec compliance. I use ZSH, it’s not technically POSIX compliant but close enough that I virtually never have to think about it. Technically correct would probably have been “sh derivative” or something.
Who hurt you?
Why?
Not enough caffeine. Please disregard.