People can have opinions about AI or dislike it, the problem is that a lot of Anti-AI people don’t understand that facts must be based on and supported by reality. Something that isn’t the case with this argument considering that:
There are open-source volunteer run services that are in fact free, and open-source (@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com already mentioned the AIhorde in the other thread), and to add to that…
There are low power models that can run on a standard GPU and cooling, if one has a gaming PC they can run it themselves for the price and energy usage of a gaming session.
You can dislike that people use AI software, but the things you say need to align with reality otherwise it’s lying and it costs you credibility. Strawman arguments and ad-homeim aren’t going to fix that or make you seem more right. At the end of the day people are entitled to their own opinions. However facts rarely care about people’s feelings, and in this case they don’t care about yours.
I await the logical fallacies that people will spit out to try and combat this.
People can have opinions about AI or dislike it, the problem is that a lot of Anti-AI people don’t understand that facts must be based on and supported by reality. Something that isn’t the case with this argument considering that:
You can dislike that people use AI software, but the things you say need to align with reality otherwise it’s lying and it costs you credibility. Strawman arguments and ad-homeim aren’t going to fix that or make you seem more right. At the end of the day people are entitled to their own opinions. However facts rarely care about people’s feelings, and in this case they don’t care about yours. I await the logical fallacies that people will spit out to try and combat this.