return2ozma@lemmy.worldcake to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Luigi Mangione Musical Set to Debut Next Month. The Entire Run Is Already Sold Outpeople.comexternal-linkmessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1462arrow-down118cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldluigimangione@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1444arrow-down1external-linkLuigi Mangione Musical Set to Debut Next Month. The Entire Run Is Already Sold Outpeople.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.worldcake to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square48linkfedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldluigimangione@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前No, you’re trying to be an absolutist about something you cannot be an absolutist about and it’s making you sound like a moron.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前I think I understand your confusion. The statement was never absolutist. It was: Killing evil people CAN have [nothing but negative outcomes.] It does NOT say: Killing evil people WILL have [nothing but negative outcomes.] To reiterate the statement for you, it says that a murder does not always yield any beneficial results. Does that help you?
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前So your point is that murder may have beneficial consequences, or it may not, correct? Because nobody here or ever in the history of man is arguing that murder always has positive consequences.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前No, that was your point. My point was that random murder in the streets is and should be illegal.
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前lol don’t tell me what my fuckin point was you goober hahaha
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Don’t ask me which one of us said it then.
No, you’re trying to be an absolutist about something you cannot be an absolutist about and it’s making you sound like a moron.
I think I understand your confusion. The statement was never absolutist. It was:
Killing evil people CAN have [nothing but negative outcomes.]
It does NOT say:
Killing evil people WILL have [nothing but negative outcomes.]
To reiterate the statement for you, it says that a murder does not always yield any beneficial results. Does that help you?
So your point is that murder may have beneficial consequences, or it may not, correct? Because nobody here or ever in the history of man is arguing that murder always has positive consequences.
No, that was your point. My point was that random murder in the streets is and should be illegal.
lol don’t tell me what my fuckin point was you goober hahaha
Don’t ask me which one of us said it then.