I’m inclined to go with the long-term cost savings of a radio that does everything but wondering if others have good reasons to go with a dedicated, simplified rig. I would be purchasing used equipment either way. And would have to use either radio for base as well as mobile use. #PublicSevice #VHF #UHF

[EDIT] to clarify I’m in the US, where “public service” (being communications support for primarily bike and foot races, where I live) does indeed happen on the amateur VHF/UHF bands. This is who I volunteer with, for context: https://www.hpsnc.org/. They also require a mobile (not handheld) radio at least 25W.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Based on your updated question, I’d go with cheap and nasty. The radio will be subjected to abuse and the cheaper it is, the less you’ll cry when someone drops it, as opposed to having a Yeasu handheld, or mobile base station dropping on the floor.

    The other thing to consider is that you can purchase a several dozen cheap Chinese radios and drop one on the floor every month for the next few years and still spend less money than buying a Yaesu FTX-1F Portable when it becomes available.

    There’s debate about Baofeng vs Wouxun, buy one of each and see what you like. The Baeofengs are cheap and sometimes hard to program, the Wouxun is more of a robust radio, but you might not need it.

    Consider for example what happens when it rains.

    We tested a whole bunch of radios during our hamfest in 2023, report is here: https://github.com/vk6flab/rhp

    • K3LOE@lemmy.radioOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cool study, good report! Lots of interesting things there, including the variability of the Baofengs.

      Yes, seems like the consensus here is towards a separate bruiser that’s not too precious.