Mambabasa@slrpnk.netM to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 年前We want the zero hour work week!slrpnk.netimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1264arrow-down134
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageWe want the zero hour work week!slrpnk.netMambabasa@slrpnk.netM to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 年前message-square65linkfedilink
minus-square9tr6gyp3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 年前Yes. There are zero places in the original post where it says “nobody needs to work” It says “We want the zero hour work week!”.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前 If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
minus-square9tr6gyp3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前Thats a totally different thing than “nobody needs to work”.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前No it isn’t. If everyone is entitled to work 0 hours, then nobody is required to work. They are equivalent.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前You are welcome to disagree with the standard definitions of words, yes. Its not generally advised, but you do you.
Yes. There are zero places in the original post where it says “nobody needs to work” It says “We want the zero hour work week!”.
Thats a totally different thing than “nobody needs to work”.
No it isn’t.
If everyone is entitled to work 0 hours, then nobody is required to work. They are equivalent.
Agree to disagree then.
You are welcome to disagree with the standard definitions of words, yes.
Its not generally advised, but you do you.