• Obi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sure, but they should do it properly e.g. officially rescind these agreements (I’m sure there’s a process for that).

    • lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why?

      Maintaining “decorum” is the entire reason we’re in this mess to begin with.

      You give these asshats an inch, they run a mile with it and demand to know why you didn’t let them run 10 miles since you already let them run one mile.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I don’t care about “these asshats” but I really don’t want my governments to engage in a diplomatic race to the bottom or to start disregarding their own agreements willy nilly, it’s just not a good precedent. Also an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind and all that. I understand that might be easy for me to say from a somewhat outside perspective but really, nothing good will come from doing this kind of stupid shit, we need to keep our heads high, respect the rules we agreed on and generally make sure we keep everything kosher, that’s the only long term play and the only way we can maintain trust from the rest of our allies. Otherwise we’re just like them.

        Besides I’m not saying “roll over and take it”, rescinding the agreements is a much stronger move than an isolated (and illegal) refusal at the border.

        • lka1988@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          That was President Biden’s choice of path to take. Look where it got us.

          Denmark needs to tear up those agreements, because they will be trampled on.

          • Obi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Right, I think we agree on what needs to be done, I just want it to be done for real, at the diplomatic level, not an isolated move by a random border patrol agent.

    • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      What does “proper” to any country engaging with the US matter if the US ignores it and then fucks them over for doing it?

      It was proper of Canada to uphold the trade agreement reached in Trumps first term, the US reneged on this and is dropping tariffs hand over fist regardless, and now no one is a winner.

      Doing anything properly necessitates two parties can agree on something at a minimum and uphold that.

      The US is an un-agreeable, improper, traitorous entity, therefore nothing can be done “properly”.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If Europe starts doing illegal shit like this, we will lose trust from the rest of our allies which aren’t going down the drain. I’ve written the US off already, but going all loose-cannon will set the precedent that we can’t be trusted and compromise the rest of our international relationships.

        I don’t think the US needs to agree to anything in order to rescind whatever agreement is being discussed here.

        • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I understand what you are saying, but context matters as well, and has superseded bureaucracy depending on the situation historically.

          Poland never formally declared war on Germany in response to the invasion on September 1, 1939. Do you think badly of Poland for this because they didn’t “properly” declare war before trying to fight back?

          I am doubtful, because the context matters to you in understanding what they were doing, and why they were doing it.

          • Obi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s fair, and I do agree in extreme circumstances decisions might need to be taken without having the time or resources to follow process, but we better choose those moments very fucking carefully. An invasion would qualify, this “visit” would not, imo.